FrameworkMapper
NIST CSF v2 CIS Controls GLBA-aligned

Cybersecurity Compliance for Financial Services

Meet GLBA, state regulatory requirements, and cyber insurance standards. FrameworkMapper maps your security stack to NIST CSF v2 and CIS Controls — the frameworks regulators and examiners expect.

Why This Matters

Financial Services Is the #1 Target

Banks, credit unions, and financial advisors face the highest concentration of cybercriminal activity — and increasingly stringent regulatory expectations.

🏦
#1

Most-targeted industry by cybercriminals

Source: Verizon DBIR 2023

⚖️

The FTC's updated Safeguards Rule (GLBA) now requires a formal information security program for non-bank financial institutions

💸
$5.9M

Average cost of a financial services data breach

Source: IBM

🔍

State banking examiners and NCUA are actively reviewing cybersecurity programs against NIST CSF and CIS benchmarks

Recommended Frameworks

What Financial Institutions Should Be Using

FrameworkMapper supports all frameworks below, with financial-services-tuned prioritization built in.

Framework Why It Applies Status
NIST CSF v2 Widely adopted by financial regulators including FFIEC, OCC, and state banking agencies Strongly Recommended
CIS Controls v8.1 Practical implementation path that satisfies GLBA Safeguards Rule technical requirements Strongly Recommended
NIST SP 800-53 Applicable for financial institutions under federal oversight or processing federal payments Conditional

How FrameworkMapper Helps

Tools Built for Regulated Financial Institutions

🗺️

Document Your Security Posture for Examiners

The Coverage Aggregator maps your tools against NIST CSF v2 and CIS Controls — producing documentation you can show regulators, examiners, and auditors as evidence of a functioning security program.

Launch Aggregator
🔍

Find Financial-Grade Security Tools

ToolMapper filters by the Financial Services vertical, surfacing tools with relevant certifications (SOC 2, FedRAMP) and Gartner/Forrester analyst coverage appropriate for regulated financial institutions.

Launch ToolMapper
📊

Run Assessments That Satisfy GLBA Requirements

The NIST CSF v2 and CIS Controls assessments produce reports structured to address the components of a GLBA-compliant information security program — risk assessment, access controls, incident response, and more.

View Assessments
UCPA · Vertical Profile V06 (Proxy)

Financial Services Priority Scoring Weights

The Universal Control Prioritization Algorithm uses seven factors, each weighted to reflect the regulatory and threat realities of financial services security programs.

Factor Financial Weight What This Means
T Threat Relevance 0.20 Financial fraud, credential theft, and supply chain attacks weighted
D Dependency Score 0.15 Foundation controls enabling regulatory compliance architecture
E Effort-to-Value 0.15 Practical sequencing for IT teams under examiner scrutiny
B Blast Radius 0.15 Controls preventing customer data exposure and financial losses
R Regulatory Criticality 0.20 GLBA, state regs, and examiner requirements drive compliance weight
C Coverage Breadth 0.10 Controls satisfying multiple regulatory framework requirements
A Asset Exposure 0.05 Controls protecting customer financial data and core systems

Financial Services uses the SLTT (State & Local Government) weight profile as a proxy — both operate under significant regulatory pressure from multiple oversight bodies. Threat Relevance and Regulatory Criticality each carry the highest weight at 0.20, reflecting the dual pressure of active criminal targeting and mandatory compliance obligations from GLBA, state banking regulators, and examiners. A dedicated Financial Services profile (V04) is on the FrameworkMapper roadmap.

Read the Full UCPA Methodology See the Financial Services Sample Assessment
Tool Trust Index · Service Industries Baseline (V17–V21)

Financial Services Tool Trust Profile

Tools recommended for Financial Services are scored against this signal profile. Customers may toggle the ○ signals on within their account; KEV cannot be disabled.

Signal Defaults

on available n/a
KEV
MA
FedRAMP
GovRAMP
FIPS
CSA
59
TTIraw maximum
0.3
RAMP weight
3
Signals on

Financial Services as a broad category inherits the Service Industries baseline. For sub-sectors with their own dedicated profiles, see Banking (V01) and Insurance (V02) — both carry the same 0.3 RAMP weight with FIPS 140 default ON and CSA STAR available. A unified Financial Services profile is on the TTI v1.1 roadmap.

Read the Full Tool Trust Index

Ready to assess your organization's regulatory compliance posture?

Start free with the Coverage Aggregator or run a full NIST CSF v2 or CIS Controls assessment structured for financial services regulators and examiners.

Related Resources